Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Weighing bone-targeted treatment options for patients with solid tumours and skeletal complications from metastatic disease

  • Lesley Fallowfield
  • , Roger von Moos
  • , Luis Costa
  • , Alison Stopeck
  • , Mark Clemons
  • , Noel Clarke
  • , Ada Braun
  • , Karen Chung
  • University of Sussex
  • Kantonsspital Graubünden
  • Instituto de Medicina Molecular
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Manchester
  • Amgen Incorporated

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The complications of metastatic bone disease (MBD) in advanced cancer, especially skeletal-related events (SREs), are a significant cause of morbidity that can seriously impair the quality of patients' lives. Treatments that prevent SREs, reduce or delay the onset of pain and preserve function and activities of daily living are central to good patient care. In this article, we discuss results from clinical trials that show the relative benefits and harms of different bone-targeted agents, which may be given orally, intravenously or subcutaneously. These data, when considered alongside various patient characteristics, can provide oncologists with better opportunities to individualise care. Optimal management with treatments that enhance efficacy and adherence mean that clinicians can improve the outlook for their patients with MBD, who may consequently experience fewer SREs and less pain and enjoy a better overall quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-155
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Oncology and Haematology
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Keywords

  • Advanced cancer
  • Bisphosphonates
  • Bone metastases
  • Bone resorption
  • Clinical trials
  • Denosumab
  • Metastatic bone disease
  • Osteoclast
  • RANK ligand

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weighing bone-targeted treatment options for patients with solid tumours and skeletal complications from metastatic disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this