Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Where do neurodevelopmental conditions fit in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks? Incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum

  • Giorgia Michelini
  • , Christina O. Carlisi
  • , Nicholas R. Eaton
  • , Jed T. Elison
  • , John D. Haltigan
  • , Roman Kotov
  • , Robert F. Krueger
  • , Robert D. Latzman
  • , James J. Li
  • , Holly F. Levin-Aspenson
  • , Giovanni A. Salum
  • , Susan C. South
  • , Kasey Stanton
  • , Irwin D. Waldman
  • , Sylia Wilson
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University College London
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • University of Toronto
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of North Texas
  • Child Mind Institute, Inc.
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatria do Desenvolvimento para a Infância e Adolescência São Paulo
  • Purdue University
  • University of Wyoming
  • Emory University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Features of autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, learning disorders, intellectual disabilities, and communication and motor disorders usually emerge early in life and are associated with atypical neurodevelopment. These “neurodevelopmental conditions” are grouped together in the DSM-5 and ICD-11 to reflect their shared characteristics. Yet, reliance on categorical diagnoses poses significant challenges in both research and clinical settings (e.g., high co-occurrence, arbitrary diagnostic boundaries, high within-disorder heterogeneity). Taking a transdiagnostic dimensional approach provides a useful alternative for addressing these limitations, accounting for shared underpinnings across neurodevelopmental conditions, and characterizing their common co-occurrence and developmental continuity with other psychiatric conditions. Neurodevelopmental features have not been adequately considered in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks, although this would have fundamental implications for research and clinical practices. Growing evidence from studies on the structure of neurodevelopmental and other psychiatric conditions indicates that features of neurodevelopmental conditions cluster together, delineating a “neurodevelopmental spectrum” ranging from normative to impairing profiles. Studies on shared genetic underpinnings, overlapping cognitive and neural profiles, and similar developmental course and efficacy of support/treatment strategies indicate the validity of this neurodevelopmental spectrum. Further, characterizing this spectrum alongside other psychiatric dimensions has clinical utility, as it provides a fuller view of an individual's needs and strengths, and greater prognostic utility than diagnostic categories. Based on this compelling body of evidence, we argue that incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum into transdiagnostic frameworks has considerable potential for transforming our understanding, classification, assessment, and clinical practices around neurodevelopmental and other psychiatric conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-357
Number of pages25
JournalWorld Psychiatry
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Neurodevelopmental conditions
  • attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • communication and motor disorders
  • intellectual disabilities
  • learning disabilities
  • neurodevelopmental spectrum
  • transdiagnostic approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Where do neurodevelopmental conditions fit in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks? Incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this