Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Where Do Quasar Hosts Lie with Respect to the Size-Mass Relation of Galaxies?

  • John D. Silverman
  • , Tommaso Treu
  • , Xuheng Ding
  • , Knud Jahnke
  • , Vardha N. Bennert
  • , Simon Birrer
  • , Malte Schramm
  • , Andreas Schulze
  • , Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe
  • , David B. Sanders
  • , Renyue Cen
  • The University of Tokyo
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Wuhan University
  • Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
  • California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  • National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • Princeton University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The evolution of the galaxy size-mass relation has been a puzzle for over a decade. High-redshift galaxies are significantly more compact than galaxies observed today at an equivalent mass, but how much of this apparent growth is driven by progenitor bias, minor mergers, secular processes, or feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is unclear. To help disentangle the physical mechanisms at work by addressing the latter, we study the size-M stellar relation of 32 carefully selected broad-line AGN hosts at 1.2 < z < 1.7 (7.5 < log M BH < 8.5; L bol/L Edd ⪆ 0.1). Using the Hubble Space Telescope with multiband photometry and state-of-the-art modeling techniques, we measure half-light radii while accounting for uncertainties from subtracting bright central point sources. We find AGN hosts to have sizes ranging from ∼1 to 6 kpc at M stellar ∼ (0.3-1) × 1011 M o. Thus, many hosts have intermediate sizes as compared to equal-mass star-forming and quiescent galaxies. While inconsistent with the idea that AGN feedback may induce an increase in galaxy sizes, this finding is consistent with hypotheses in which AGNs preferentially occur in systems with prior concentrated gas reservoirs, or are involved in a secular compaction processes perhaps responsible for building their bulges. If driven by minor mergers that do not grow central black holes as fast as they do bulge-like stellar structures, such a process would explain both the galaxy size-mass relation observed here and the evolution in the black hole-bulge mass relation described in a companion paper.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberL5
JournalAstrophysical Journal Letters
Volume887
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 10 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Where Do Quasar Hosts Lie with Respect to the Size-Mass Relation of Galaxies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this